They have hit a research center and production facilities that may have had something to do with the alleged chemical attack in Douma by Syria’s armed forces. There’s no proof so far, the site hasn’t been properly investigated and Russia is convinced that the chemical weapons incident was ‘orchestrated’.
It was a limited strike, and the Pentagon said it would be a ‘one time’ warning.
What the UK, the US and France hope to accomplish with this is anyone’s guess. It certainly won’t change the situation on the ground, as Assad is winning the war with or without chemical weapons. The move has also infuriated Russia, which sees this as wanton violence towards a country that was finally getting closer to peace. Perhaps they just wanted to symbolically show they care about human lives… Human lives which can be lost in Yemen, Palestine and Syria, as long as no gas is involved.
Russian casualties have been avoided. Russia claims a third of the missiles were intercepted by Syrian defense systems, he Russian systems weren’t involved.
The strikes were launched from the Red Sea and also from Cyprus and a coalition base in Syria itself. Damascus and Homs were hit.
If in the coming weeks news about a new chemical attack emerges, who will believe that Assad is behind it? It would give the coalition the perfect pretext for a much heavier strike. This strike was a mere pin prick.
If the chemical attack was indeed orchestrated by the rebels, it’s highly likely they will release gas on their own territory again.
Alarming is that the coalition has punished a country without proving its guilt. A violation of a judicial principle all three countries hold dear…
In the picture: A fighter jet prepares to land at RAF Akrotiri, a military base Britain maintains on Cyprus, April 14, 2018 © Yiannis Kourtoglou / Reuters
PS
If anyone is guilty of using gas it’s the US and its allies, it supplied Saddam with gas to use against Iran in the 80’s, killing at least 50,000 Iranians…
Governments acting without impunity.
LikeLiked by 1 person
With impunity. Yes, indeed…
LikeLike
Yes.
LikeLiked by 1 person
What do you think we can do to prevent more hypocrisy and more illegal moves?
LikeLike
Well, I’m only a citizen on the UK and I know we already feel we made a mistake in the last election. We’re sitting with the DUP in goverment. I would say in the future to recognise that the governments voted in will also have to be entrusted to make these decisions and since the UK is now so anti intervention. That a more leftist gov is probably needed.
What would you suggest?
LikeLiked by 1 person
No, idea. Spreading the alternative views on this issue is one thing, but ultimately that’s not enough. Trouble is that we all have to make money and that it would take a huge amount of time and energy and good sense and people skills to start a pro peace activist group in Slovakia, for example…
LikeLike
Well keep going with spreading the alternative views, and hopefully, funds will accumulate over time. I completely understand what you mean, there are projects I would love to run.
LikeLiked by 1 person